The Paradox of Self-Amendment:
A Study of Law, Logic, Omnipotence, and ChangePeter Suber, Philosophy Department, Earlham College
This book was originally published by Peter Lang Publishing, 1990, but is now out of print.
ISBN 0-8204-1212-0
Copyright © 1990, Peter Suber.
Table of Contents
Now searchable.
Preface to the Print Edition (34.5k)
Preface to the Online Edition (4.6k)
Part One. The Paradox of Self-Amendment Section 1. Introduction: Logical Paradoxes in Law (61.8k)
- Paradoxes that perplex, and paradoxes that prove
- "Solving" paradoxes in logic and law
- Self-amendment
- Logical v. legal approaches to self-amendment
Section 2. Preliminaries: Amendment Clauses (38.1k)
Section 3. The Dilemma (37.4k)
- Self-application v. infinite regress
- Primary and secondary rules
- Is law finite?
- The paradox of omnipotence, the barber, and the liar
Section 4. The Denial of Self-Application (18.1k)
Section 5. Self-Application (30.8k)
Section 6. The Inference and Acceptance Models of Legal Change (37.5k)
- Weaknesses of the inference model cured by the acceptance model
- Ross's solution: the invisible, immutable amendment clause
- Solutions from the model of direct acceptance
Section 7. Hart's Theory of Acceptance (40.5k)
Section 8. Omnipotence and Immutability (125.2k)
- Omnipotence and immutability are inseparable concepts
- Entrenchment, self-entrenchment, disentrenchment
- Supposed limitations on the U.S. federal amending power
Section 9. Entrenchment, Self-Entrenchment, and Disentrenchment of the Amendment Clause Itself (108.1k)
- Types and distinctions
- Reflexivity tangles in New Mexico
- Self-disentrenchment of the AC
- Entrenchment and time
- Self-repeal
Section 10. Attempts to Dissolve the Paradox: Time (55.4k)
- Ross's answer to the time-based objection
- "Valid until amended", temporal indexing, universal self-entrenchment
- The procedural model
- Other views
- One more try at satisfying the inference model
Section 11. Attempts to Dissolve the Paradox: Self-Embracing Omnipotence and Specific Authorization (22.5k)
Part Two. Variations on the Theme Section 12. Introduction to Part Two (62.7k)
- The exclusivity of the federal AC
- Indirect self-amendment
- Self-amendment without inconsistency
- Self-amendment of a non-supreme rule of change
Section 13. The See-Saw Method (17.2k)
Section 14. Amendment by Sunset Clause (33.3k)
Section 15. Amendment by Interpretation (43.2k)
Section 16. Amendment by Implication (48.8k)
- The lex posterior principle v. self-entrenchment
- Was the adoption of the Tenth Amendment a case of self-amendment?
- Was the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment a case of self-amendment?
- The lex posterior principle self-applied
Section 17. Amendment by Treaty (31.0k)
Section 18. Amendment by "Inalienable Right to Alter or Abolish Government" (28.1k)
Section 19. Amendment by Desuetude (25.6k)
Section 20. Other Selected Paradoxes and Reflexivities in Law (112.6k)
- Protagoras v. Euathlus
- State v. Jones
- Self-referring laws
- The liar
- Circular liens and liabilities
- The bootstrap doctrine
- Inferences drawn from the fact of the dispute
- Reflexivities of sovereignty
- Self-amendment
- Permissible disobedience
- Contract reflexivities
- "More of the same"
- Breaking vicious circles
- To know before we know
- Tax reflexivities
- Circular reasoning
Section 21. Conclusions and Explorations (155.9k)
- Summary
- Acceptance and consistency
- Some oddities and implications
- A word on the merits of the direct acceptance theory
- Self-application
Appendix 1. Attempts to Amend the Federal Amendment Clause (34.4k)
- Recent proposals
- An historical proposal passed by Congress
- Historical proposals not passed by Congress
- The Articles of Confederation
- Selected suggestions by writers
Appendix 2. Self-Amendment of State Amendment Clauses (55.5k)
Appendix 3. Nomic: A Game of Self-Amendment (39.1k)
Bibliography (112.1k)
Index
- I omit the index from this HTML edition.
Search the online edition of this book. Multiple words are linked by the selected Boolean operator. Word fragments return all completions, e.g. amend returns amend, amends, amended, amending, amendment and so on.
Peter Suber,
Department of Philosophy,
Earlham College, Richmond, Indiana, 47374, U.S.A.
peters@earlham.edu. Copyright © 1990, 1998, Peter Suber.