Open Access News

News from the open access movement


Friday, August 29, 2008

Toward a database of open projects

Jonathan Gray, A Map of Openness? Open Knowledge Foundation Weblog, August 28, 2008.  Excerpt:

We’ve recently been in conversation with various individuals about starting a project to map open projects and groups....

We’ve put a few notes about the project on the OKF [Open Knowledge Foundation] wiki [here].

A tentative description of the projects reads:

A versioned database of open projects, open initiatives and the organisations and individuals behind them. A publicly editable directory and knowledge base of information about these projects and groups. A visual interface to explore and analyse the material.

Related developments include:

  • Michel [Bauwens] has blogged a bit about the initiative here, and has made an ‘Open’ category on the P2P Foundation wiki - including “descriptions of nearly 400 open concepts and initiatives, a list of open definitions, a directory of podcasts on the topics to learn more (and soon: a directory of video webcasts)”.
  • Heather [Ford] has put a diagram - which she used in her iSummit ‘08 keynote speech - on her blog.
  • Mark [Surman] started a page on the Open Everything wiki for starting to gather examples of different kinds of open projects.

We’d love to have a wiki-like registry (like CKAN) with a visual interface for exploring the material - perhaps using something like Prefuse or Processing.

If you have any thoughts - or you’d like to get involved - please get in touch on our discuss list or at info at the OKF domain name!

Comment.  This is a great idea.  If I can speak for the Open Access Directory, we've been considering something similar (and narrower):  at least a list of university-based initiatives and at least those initiatives focused on OA to research literature and data.  We have a draft list under development, but it's on hold while we try to figure out how make the best use of the limited database functionality of the Mediawiki software, e.g. so that we can tag each initiative by type, discipline, nation, and so on.  But no matter who does it, and no matter how many similar projects overlap, it's still a great idea.