Open Access News

News from the open access movement


Wednesday, July 12, 2006

More on the RCUK policy

Eliot Marshall, A Mixed Bag of U.K. Open-Access Plans, Science, July 7, 2006 (accessible only to subscribers). Excerpt:
The open-access movement chalked up a victory in Britain last week, but it did not get the universal mandate for free release of research papers that some advocates want. In a long-delayed policy statement on 28 June, the executive board of Research Councils U.K. (RCUK), an umbrella organization for government funding bodies, said that all peerreviewed journal papers produced by publicly funded research must be made available for free soon after they’re completed. Exactly what that means was not specified, and RCUK left each research council to set its own rules. In coordinated announcements, some set out hard-edged policies whereas others said they were still debating what to do....

The news that MRC [Medical Research Council] is setting hard deadlines [an OA mandate with a maximum six-month delay] won praise from some advocates of open access, such as BioMed Central, a London-based commercial scientific publisher funded by billing authors rather than readers. “It was a very important step,” says publisher Matthew Cockerill. “Not many other funding institutions have gone as far.”...

Cockerill was also encouraged by a sentence in the MRC announcement indicating that the government may pay the costs of publishing in open-access journals....[BMC and PLoS hare recently raised their fees, and the Royal Society is starting out with high fees.] No-subscription publishing can be very expensive, says London-based consultant Mary Waltham, “and many publishers were disappointed” last week to see that RCUK did not back its open-access policy with a promise of new financial support.