Open Access News

News from the open access movement


Saturday, June 28, 2008

OECD releases new recommendations on PSI

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development released a new Recommendation of the Council for Enhanced Access and More Effective Use of Public Sector Information at its recent Ministerial Meeting on the Future of the Internet Economy (Seoul, June 17-18, 2008).
... [The Council] recommends that, in establishing or reviewing their policies regarding access and use of public sector information, Member countries take due account of and implement the following principles ...
  • Openness. Maximising the availability of public sector information for use and re-use based upon presumption of openness as the default rule to facilitate access and re-use. ...
  • Access and transparent conditions for re-use. Encouraging broad non-discriminatory competitive access and conditions for re-use of public sector information, eliminating exclusive arrangements, and removing unnecessary restrictions on the ways in which it can be accessed, used, re-used, combined or shared, so that in principle all accessible information would be open to re-use by all. Improving access to information over the Internet and in electronic form. ...
  • Asset lists. Strengthening awareness of what public sector information is available for access and re-use. ...
  • Quality. Ensuring methodical data collection and curation practices to enhance quality and reliability ...
  • Integrity. ... Developing and implementing appropriate safeguards to protect information from unauthorised modification ...
  • New technologies and long-term preservation. Improving interoperable archiving, search and retrieval technologies ...
  • Copyright. Intellectual property rights should be respected. There is a wide range of ways to deal with copyrights on public sector information, ranging from governments or private entities holding copyrights, to public sector information being copyright-free. Exercising copyright in ways that facilitate re-use ... and encouraging institutions and government agencies that fund works from outside sources to find ways to make these works widely accessible to the public.
  • Pricing. When public sector information is not provided free of charge, pricing public sector information transparently and consistently ... Where possible, costs charged to any user should not exceed marginal costs of maintenance and distribution ...
  • Competition. ... Requiring public bodies to treat their own downstream/value-added activities on the same basis as their competitors for comparable purposes ... Promoting non-exclusive arrangements for disseminating information so that public sector information is open to all possible users and re-users on non-exclusive terms.
  • Public private partnerships. Facilitating public-private partnerships where appropriate and feasible in making public sector information available ...
  • International access and use. ... [P]romote greater interoperability and facilitate sharing and comparisons of national and international datasets. Striving for interoperability and compatible and widely used common formats.
  • Best practices. Encouraging the wide sharing of best practices and exchange of information on enhanced implementation ...
Comment. This statement piles on previous recommendations by the OECD (e.g. as described here). See also the earlier report from the working group that prepared these recommendations.
  • The recommendations on competition and public-private partnerships align well with the Princeton model for OA to government data.
  • It's noteworthy that the recommendations call for greater online access, and that they suggest applying them to work funded by government agencies, not just that created by government employees. But the recommendations are for data, not scientific publications. Nevertheless, the principle should be somewhat transferable.
  • Managing copyright to facilitate re-use is a good recommendation; so is limiting user fees to those necessary to recoup the marginal costs of providing access. But the recommendations could have gone farther and called for government works to be in the public domain. They also stopped short of calling for greater clarity on the copyright status of data, and for the lifting of legal rights on data where they exist.