Open Access NewsNews from the open access movement Jump to navigation |
|||
Inhofe's amendments to undermine the OA mandate at NIH Charles Bailey, Text of the Inhofe Amendments That Affect the NIH Open Access Mandate, DigitalKoans, October 22, 2007.
Comment. Note precisely how the second of these two amendments would weaken the OA provision: the OA mandate would apply "only where allowed by and in accordance with the policies of the publishers...." If that sounds familiar, the reason is that it's nearly identical to the loophole in the OA mandate adopted last month by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). The CIHR policy mandates OA for CIHR-funded research "where allowable and in accordance with publisher policies...." Here's what I said about the loophole in the CIHR policy at the time:
Publishers clearly agree and want the same easy opt-out from the NIH policy. |