Open Access News

News from the open access movement


Tuesday, July 31, 2007

More on OA for university press monographs

Dorothea Salo, Drive-by thoughts on the Ithaka report, Caveat Lector, July 30, 2007.  Excerpt:

The Ithaka folks put out a really sharp report on the state of university presses and libraries vis-a-vis scholarly publishing last week. This is excellent stuff; I highly recommend it. A few random thoughts on it....

The hits at institutional repositories are so good I’m going to quote them in [a forthcoming] article. Yes, we are dusty university attics. No, I don’t like it either. However… we’re not as well-funded as the uni presses think we are. Nor I don’t understand why some of these folks aren’t working with us, neither. Heaven forbid we should solve some of their preservation problems or give their backlist new distribution channels or rescue their out-of-print works or anything. But siloing and Not Invented Here is the heart of the difficulty, isn’t it? ...

I don’t mind the print-on-demand-for-pay models so much, but I do think trying to make direct money off e-publishing, especially of low-demand monographs, is a pipe dream. Bite the bullet and go open-access. The argument you then take to university brass is a cost-containment one: “This stuff needs to get published. It can get published at zero marginal cost and at the same time take advantage of greater reach from data-mining and web crawling, or it can get published in print at huge marginal cost and languish in warehouses because libraries can’t afford to buy it, or it can get published online with totally unnecessary (and possibly not recoupable) marginal costs of building and maintaining secure datacenters and fulfillment operations, or it can not get published at all and torpedo careers. You tell me what makes the most sense.” ...