CIRP First-Year Student Survey Fall 2007
Office of Institutional Research

Mary Ann Weaver, George W. Ferriell, Jr., and Logan Schuerman

March, 2008

 

 

Click below for links to tables within this report

Political Views	Views on Social Issues-Government and Institutions
Probable Career Occupation	Views on Social Issues-Lifestyles
Reasons to Attend College	Activities in Past Year
Reasons to Attend Specific College	Self-Ratings
Probable Major Field of Study	Activities in College
Important Objectives

Each year the CIRP survey, sponsored by the Higher Education Research Institute and the Cooperative Institutional Research Program, is given to entering college students. In the fall of 2007, this survey was completed by 272,036 students from 356 institutions across the nation. This number included 263 of Earlham’s 300 first-year students (87.7%). The data provides interesting findings that compare Earlham students with the national sample concerning their personal history, family characteristics, educational goals, values, attitudes on social issues, behavioral patterns, and a variety of other issues.

As a member of the Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium, the responses of Earlham’s first-year students are compared to the responses of Earlham's peer schools. See Appendix for a list of the institutions represented in Earlham's peer group.

Women comprise 52.7% of Earlham’s first-year student sample. The proportion of African-American students among Earlham respondents is 8.4% while the proportion at the national level for all institutions is 10.7% and 5.6% for the peer group. Although 81.2% of the Earlham respondents identified themselves as White/Caucasian, 31.4% were from minority categories and 8% indicated "other" ethnicity. This reflects students indicating more than one racial category.

In religious preference, 10.4% of Earlham first-year students are Quaker (versus .2% nationally), 5.6% are Jewish, 8% Catholic, and 4.4% Buddhist. There were 8.4% who responded that they are “other Christian” and 8.4% who said “other religion.” Many more Earlham students (42.4%) reported having no religious preference compared to the national sample where 19.4% had no religious preference.

Very few of the respondents from the first-year Earlham class (2.3%) live within five miles of campus; even fewer (.8%) report living six to 100 miles away. Another 31% live within 101 and 500 miles of the college, and 52.5% are more than 500 miles away from home. These findings confirm that Earlham continues to be a “national” institution. Nationwide, a mere 13.4% of students attend an institution more than 500 miles from their home. In compliance with Earlham’s housing policy, 98.1% of the Earlham first-year students plan on living in college housing. This compares to 82.5% of students nationally.

Eighty-six percent of the Earlham first-year students responded to a question about their parent's income. Parental income below $25,000 was reported by 13.3% of these new students at Earlham; income of $50,000 or more by 71.2%. About half (50.6%) of Earlham's entering cohort expect family resources to cover over $10,000 of their first year’s educational expenses. This compares to 32.4% nationally and 66.6% for the peer group. Another 55% of the Earlham respondents expected $10,000 or more from financial aid which need not be repaid (grants, scholarships, etc.). Over half of the Earlham first-year student respondents (52.1%) have some concern about their ability to finance their college education, but feel they probably will have enough funds (47.6% for the peer group and 51.6% nationally). Among Earlham’s first-year students in 2007, 5.8% have a major concern about finances compared to 9.7% of the students entering Earlham in 2006.

The study revealed several aspects of the students' family. Among Earlham students, 23.4% reported having parents who are divorced or separated compared to 25.7% nationally and 18.9% from Earlham's peer group institutions. Earlham students tend to come from well-educated families. About half (48%) of the fathers of entering students hold graduate degrees (compared to 23% nationally and 50.7% of peer group). 13.2% of the fathers have had a formal education of high school or less (the figure is 37.7% for the national group and 10.2% for the peer group). Of the Earlham students' mothers, 43.2% have graduates degrees (18% nationally and 39.8% of the peer group) and 12.8% have high school or less (25.6% nationally and 9.3% of the peer group).

A closer look at the education of students' parents reveals that 70% of these students come from families where both parents have at least a bachelor's degree and 32.% are from families where both parents have graduate degrees. About 15.6% of these students are first generation students - neither of their parents have college degrees.

There continues to be a sizeable number of students' parents with careers in education with 12.2% of their fathers and 19% of their mothers in the field of education. The college teacher profession is most popular for the fathers (5.7%) while the mothers are more inclined to be secondary education teachers (7.1%). In 2006, 12.7% of the fathers and 22.4% of the mothers worked in the education field. Only 5.2% of the Earlham students' mothers are full-time homemakers compared to 8.9% of the nationwide sample and 12.6% of the peer group sample.

A Master's degree is the eventual educational goal of 38.8% of these first-year Earlhamites; 35.7% plan to seek an Ed.D. or Ph.D. (versus 17.5% nationally); an additional 7.1% of these entering students expect to earn a doctorate in a medical field. This is a smaller percentage than the peer group. According to HEDS, 13.7% of students at peer institutions plan to get a medical degree.

Earlham is the first college choice for 60.1% of entering students. This is down from last year when 64.7% of Earlham first year students indicated Earlham was their first choice of colleges. In 2007, 60.2% of students in the peer group and 64.1% nationwide were attending their first choice college. Among Earlham’s entering students, 8.4% did not apply at any other college; 27.6% applied at seven or more other colleges. Responses from the peer group show that 36.5% of their students applied to seven or more other colleges and 13.% applied only to the school they are attending. Nationwide, 17.3% applied to only one college and 12.5% applied to seven or more.

How did students spend their time in the last year? We see that the biggest block of time was spent socializing with friends. About three-quarters (71.2 %) of Earlham’s entering students spent six or more hours per week socializing; 22.4% spent sixteen or more hours per week. More than half of the respondents (56.3%) spent six or more hours a week studying or doing homework, and 19.2% of these students spent more than sixteen hours a week studying. These figures are much higher than the national percentages yet almost identical to the peer group. Only 33.8% of students nationally reported spending more than six hours studying, and a mere 6.9% spent over sixteen hours a week on homework. Many of the Earlham students held a job during the last year. 13.1% of the soon-to-be Earlham students spent sixteen or more hours working for pay each week while 31.5% spent six or more hours doing the same. Among Earlham students, 63.9% spent one or more hours in student organizations which is slightly less than the peer group (68.6%) and more than the national norm (48.6%).

Table 1

Political Views

As usual, Earlham students tend to be much more liberal than their national counterparts. The number of students reporting "far left" political views increased from 16.3% in 2006 to 16.8% in 2007. The percentage of "middle of the road" responses is less than half the national figure and less than our peer group.0.4% reported having political views that were "far right" in 2006 and the number remained the same for 2007.

Table 2

Probable Career Occupation

Early on in their academic career, it may be difficult for first-year students to consider what careers they expect to pursue. This survey indicated that the career expectations are fairly similar among all students. However, the Earlham students seem to be leaning more toward some of the “helping” professions such as clinical psychologist, foreign service worker, therapist, or social worker compared to the peer group and the national sample. The peer group sample had a greater percentage of students (9.5%) expecting to be physicians compared to 5.2% of Earlham students and 6.7% of the national sample. A smaller percentage (14.6%) of the nationwide sample are undecided about their probable career compared to Earlham students (34.1%) and the students from peer institutions (30%).

Table 3

Reasons Noted as Being Very Important in Choosing Their College

Reasons	Earlham			Peer Group %	All Institutions %
	Male %	Female %	Total %
College has a very good academic reputation	62.3	63.8	63.1	77.0	63.0
Wanted to go to a school the size of this college	50.8	64.7	58.1	59.2	38.9
A visit to campus	45.5	60.6	53.5	60.2	40.4
Offered financial assistance	49.2	55.1	52.3	43.0	39.4
Graduates get good jobs	28.2	38.1	33.5	47.1	51.9
College has low tuition	28.1	35.3	31.9	22.8	36.8
Grads gain admission to top graduate schools	31.4	31.9	31.6	42.8	34.1
Good social reputation	25.6	31.6	28.8	37.4	37.1
Information from a Web site	9.2	25.0	17.6	19.4	17.0
Admitted through early action/decision	12.8	14.3	13.6	26.4	11.4
Religious affiliation/orientation of college	4.2	17.0	11.0	3.1	7.4
High School counselor advised me	9.1	11.7	10.5	10.6	9.0
Rankings in national magazines	7.5	12.5	10.2	22.5	17.6
Teacher advised me	9.2	8.0	8.5	6.4	6.1
Private college counselor advised me	7.6	6.7	7.1	5.5	3.2
Wanted to live near home	7.5	5.1	6.6	8.0	19.2
Not offered aid by first choice	8.5	4.4	6.3	5.7	7.3
Relatives wanted me to come	5.0	0	2.3	2.0	4.8

 

The campus visit was very important for 53.7% of Earlham students in choosing their college. Other reasons for choosing Earlham that was noted by a large percentage of Earlham students included the size of Earlham (58.3%), its good academic reputation (63.2%), the cost of attending Earlham, and their offer of financial assistance (52.1%). Students from the peer group placed higher importance on the academic reputation, the jobs that graduates obtain, the graduate schools that grads attend, their admission through early action/decision, and the national magazine ranking of their college choice.

Table 4

Probable Major Field of Study (Percentage of Students)

In terms of probable majors of this group of entering students, the social sciences continue to make the strongest showing overall. Notable major preferences this year include Languages and Literature (11%), Biological Sciences (9%), Business (6%), and Political Science (8%). Only 13% indicated that they were undecided about their probable major.

Table 5

Objectives Considered to be Essential or Very Important

"Improving understanding of other countries and cultures" was an essential or very important life goal for 77.1% of the first-year students at Earlham. This is a significantly higher percentage than the national sample (52.3%). "Helping others in difficulty" is also a very important objective for 80.1% of these students as it is for 69.5% of the students in the national sample and 74.4% of students in the peer group. "Developing a meaningful philosophy of life" is an essential or very important life objective for 64.7% of the Earlham students compared to 49.2% nationally. Although "raising a family" currently ranks highest among these values for the national sample, only 61.1% of the Earlham sample feel that raising a family is essential or even very important. "Influencing social values" is a goal of Earlham students which is not as important to students in the national sample but is more similar to the peer group sample. "Helping to promote racial understanding" has always been considered of greater importance to Earlham students compared to the national average. "Being very well off financially" is much more important to the national sample of students (74.4%) and the peer group sample (52.7%) than to the Earlham sample (40.7%). In accordance with last years responses, Earlham students were less concerned with "being successful at a business of their own" and "obtaining recognition from colleagues". Overall, the importance of each goal differed among Earlham students the national sample, once again confirming the distinctiveness of the Earlham population. Trends for past years can be found at http://www.earlham.edu/~ir/cirp_trends/objectives.htm

Table 6

Views on Social Issues: Government and Institutions

Agree strongly or somewhat that...	Earlham			Peer Group	National
	Male %	Female %	Total %	Total %	Male %	Female %	Total %
Fed Govt not doing enough to control environmental pollution	89.3	97.8	93.8	90.8	76.5	82.5	79.8
National health care plan is needed	84.4	90.4	87.6	80.8	70.4	77.9	74.5
The Federal government should do more to control the sale of handguns	74.4	90.2	82.7	82.7	67.9	82.6	75.9
Only volunteers should serve in military	81.8	81.8	81.8	77.3	65.4	66.8	66.2
Wealthy people should pay a larger share of taxes than they do now.	73.6	85.9	80.1	66.5	57.9	58.8	58.4
Dissent is a critical component of the political process	71.1	78.9	75.1	78.3	66.4	59.6	62.8
The death penalty should be abolished	59.0	76.9	68.4	57.7	31.5	38.0	35.1
Through hard work, everybody can succeed in American society	52.1	33.8	42.5	59.0	79.3	78.4	78.8
Abolish affirmative action in college admissions	46.2	34.9	40.2	48.3	53.2	43.3	47.8
There is too much concern in the courts for the rights of criminals	32.2	20.1	25.8	34.9	59.1	53.2	55.9
Realistically, an individual can do little to bring about changes in our society.	37.5	14.0	25.0	20.1	30.4	23.4	26.5
Undocumented immigrants should be denied public education	32.2	13.3	22.3	30.5	53.7	43.5	48.1
Federal military spending should be increased	115.6	9.0	12.1	15.3	34.6	28.6	31.4

Earlham students' views on the death penalty and the rights of criminals are quite different from those of the national sample and the peer group. Earlham students in general have a liberal view with regard to government and institutions. The Earlham sample bears more similarities with the peer group sample, yet it remains clear that the Earlham students have more liberal attitudes than even their peer group. Gender differences are evident in the responses of Earlham students. Among some of the responses, females were more likely to feel that the federal government should do more to control sale of handguns, that wealthy people should pay more taxes, and that the death penalty should be abolished. In addition, Earlham females also were less likely to feel that an individual can do little to bring change in society, that undocumented immigrants should be denied public education, and that through hard work everybody can succeed in American society.

Table 7

Views on Social Issues: Lifestyles

Although 88.5% of Earlham students agree that same sex couples should have the right to legal marital status, just 63.5% of the national sample agree with this idea. The majority of the new Earlham students also agree that abortion and marijuana should be legalized. These views contrast sharply with the national group. In issues regarding homosexual relationships, there are very little gender differences among the Earlham students, unlike the national sample where more males than females feel it is important to have laws prohibiting homosexual relationships. Overall, Earlham respondents and the peer group share similar views toward these social issues. Historical data on this topic can be seen on a CIRP trends chart at http://www.earlham.edu/~ir/cirp_trends/agree.htm

Table 8

Activities Engaged in by Students in the Past Year

During the year prior to coming to college, the activities among college students nationwide appear to be similar, although Earlham students were more likely to have participated in organized demonstrations, discussed politics, played a musical instrument, accepted an invitation to a teacher’s home, and discussed religion. Students in the national sample attended more religious services than Earlham students. The greatest difference seen between Earlham and the national sample was in the percentage of students who participated in political demonstrations. Among students from the national sample, 22.2% participated in political demonstrations frequently or occasionally compared to 41.6% at Earlham.

The greatest gender difference is seen in students who felt overwhelmed by all they had to do where 43.8% of the females felt this way during the previous year and only 25.2% of the males. Significant gender differences could be seen in several other areas as well. Earlham females reported more frequently that they had attended a religious service, participated in organized demonstrations, played a musical instrument, or asked a teacher for advice after class. Earlham males reported more frequently that they had socialized with a different racial/ethnic group or drank beer.

In comparison with the peer group, a smaller percentage of Earlham students drank beer, wine or liquor. Earlham students were more likely to have participated in organized demonstrations. In contrast, students at peer institutions were more likely to have used the internet for research or homework or tutored another student

Table 9

Areas in Which Student Rated Self Above Average or Top 10%

Self-ratings of academic abilities continue to remain high among the Earlham students, though not as high as the peer group sample. The Earlham sample rated themselves higher than the national sample in their artistic ability, creativity, self understanding, writing ability, and intellectual self-confidence.

There are significant gender differences seen among the Earlham students in many areas. Only 22.8% of the females rated their computer skills as above average compared to 56.1% of the males. Females rated their mathematical ability, physical health, emotional health, and intellectual self-confidence and social self-confidence lower than the males. The Earlham males rated their understanding of others, drive to achieve, artistic ability, spirituality, and and cooperativeness lower than the females.

Earlham students rated their self understanding, artistic ability, and spirituality higher than students at peer institutions. However, students at peer institutions rated their drive to achieve, academic ability, intellectual self-confidence, leadership ability, physical health, social self-confidence, and mathematical ability higher than Earlham students.

Table 10

Students Estimate chances are Very Good That They Will...

There are remarkable differences between Earlham students and the national sample in most all of these items. For example, only 28.8% of the national sample feel there is a very good chance that they will do study abroad compared to 61.2% of the Earlham students. Additionally, Earlham students are more likely to communicate regularly with professors, socialize with someone of another racial/ethnic group, perform volunteer or community service work, participate in student protests or demonstrations, and change career choice.

The gender differences are noticeable in the areas of studying abroad, participating in student protests, participating in student clubs, performing volunteer work, getting a job to help pay for college expenses, changing career choice or major. or being satisfied with this college, where a greater percentage of Earlham females were more likely to participate in these activities. In contrast, more Earlham males (34.5%) are planning to participate in varsity sports than females (21.2%).

While 22.6% of first-year Earlham students expect to participate in student protests, only 17.2% of the students from peer institutions and 6.1% from the national sample felt the same.

 

APPENDIX

Return to CIRP Surveys

Return to Office of Institutional Research

Created by Mary Ann Weaver
weavema@earlham.edu
May , 2008