Fall 2007

In this table, the importance of various characteristics are indicated.  Those marked with an X were considered to be very important to at least 50% of the respondents.  Characteristics for which Earlham was rated higher than competitor were those for which the mean rating of Earlham was higher than the mean rating for our competitor. 

Characteristics Very important for Oberlin/Earlham applicants   Very important for Grinnell/Earlham applicants   Very important for Wooster/Earlham applicants   Very important for Beloit/Earlham applicants     Very important for Kenyon/Earlham applicants
  Earlham rated higher Oberlin rated higher   Earlham rated higher Grinnell rated higher   Earlham rated higher Wooster rated higher   Earlham rated higher Beloit rated higher     Earlham rated higher Guilford rated higher
Cost of attendance less important   less important     X     X     X  
Personal attention X       X   X       X       X
Academic reputation   X     X   X     less important       X
Student diversity X       X   X     X       X  
Environment of academic excellence   X     X   X     X         X
Quality of academic facilities   X   less important     X   less important       X
Availability of majors   X     X     X     X       X
Extra-curricular opportunities less important     X     X   X       X  
Value for the price   X   less important     X     X     X  
Special academic programs less important   less important   less important   less important     X  
Quality of social life less important   less important     X   less important       X

Compare to Fall 2006 applicants here.

Compare to Fall 2005 applicants here.

Compare to Fall 2004 applicants here.

Compare to Fall 2003 applicants here.

Compare to Fall 2002 applicants here.

 

Return to ASQ 2007 Summary    

 

 

 

 

Created by Mary Ann Weaver
weavema@earlham.edu
September 15, 2006