PhD Productivity
Weighted Baccalaureate Origins Study
Tabs available below
Methodology	Source of data and methods used to calculate ranks.
Summary	Why study PhD productivity? Earlham's ranks.
Suggested Text	Text provided by Public Affairs as an accurate summary of data
Doctorates earned	Doctorate degrees earned by Earlham grads 1996-2004 by discipline
Chart 1	Line graph showing doctorates earned by Earlham grads 1996-2004
Rank comparisons	Earlham ranks for three different time periods for each discipline.
All Disciplines	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for all disciplines
All Disciplines (Women only)	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for all disciplines for women only
Life Sciences	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Life Sciences
Earth Sciences	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Earth Sciences
Biological Sciences	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Biological Sciences
Geosciences	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Geosciences
Social Sciences	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Social Sciences
Sociology	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Sociology
Mathematics and Statistics	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Mathematics and Statistics
Math and Computer Sciences	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Math and Computer Sciences
Psychology	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Psychology
Education	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Education
Humanities	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Humanities
Social Services	Earlham ranks and peer institution ranks for Social Services
Baccalaureate Colleges	Earlham ranks and peer institutuions ranks compared to 213 liberal arts colleges
Prepared by Mary Ann Weaver and George Ferriell, Jr.
Revised November 29, 2006