| Introduction
The Earlham
Faculty consists of all teachers and administrators at the College.
While there is a division of labor and a corresponding distinction
between administrative faculty and teaching faculty, the distinction
is not a sharp one. All of us are educators in one way
or another; the unity of the faculty reflects the fact
that the College educates students in the way it operates as well as
in the classroom. Moreover, the College strives to be a community of
persons living and working together to reach common aims. This handbook
reports policies and procedures related to both groups, when applicable,
and to each group the teaching faculty and the administrators separately
when appropriate.
This
document contains two parts. The first is the faculty handbook
which is an extension of the Colleges contract with teaching
and administrative faculty.
The
second part contains the administrative policies and procedures
of the College that pertain to faculty. These policies and procedures
are not considered extensions of the Colleges contract with faculty
members.
The
aim of the faculty handbook is to provide faculty members with a clear,
accurate and comprehensive overview of their contractual relationship
to the college so that important personnel practices and related matters
are as transparent as possible. In particular it describes the processes
and criteria of evaluation for hiring, renewal, and tenure (where appropriate),
as well as the conditions under which faculty positions may be eliminated.
This handbook has evolved over time and been revised approximately
every ten years. It has been approved by the faculty meeting and the
Board of Trustees. Unless noted on the specific page, this text is
the version approved in 2002.
The
College will use the processes and definitions in this handbook to
guide its decision making. It is important that faculty members understand
their rights as well as the limits to those rights and the handbook
strives to make this clear. The policies in the handbook aim to be
equitable and fair to both the College and to faculty. We emphasize
the decision making processes of the College with special attention
to the consultation leading to the formation of consensus, as well
as the special role of the President and Board of Trustees who, in
addition to being part of the consultation and consensus process, have
independent decision making authority. Faculty members should be clear
that they have control over some aspects and parameters of their review
files and other aspects of the decision making process, but not others;
the handbook strives to make clear where each is the case.
The
previous edition of the handbook cited the Elders of Balby Friends
Meeting of 1656 who urged that rules be interpreted with the
measure of light that is pure and holy in order to avoid narrow
rule making, for the letter killeth and the Spirit giveth life.* While
we affirm that rules should be interpreted in the spirit of community
building and not be used punitively when creative solutions
to problems
may be found, we also believe that a clear articulated set of
guidelines and policies for making important decisions is an
important basis for
equity. Accordingly, we have tried to provide sufficient detail
and specificity to eliminate confusion and uncertainty yet to
resist specifying
guidelines and policies for every conceivable situation. Good
decision making must achieve a balance between impersonal rules
and personal
judgments, founded on the evidence under consideration, and this
handbook contains our latest effort to provide a framework to
lead us to good
decisions.
________________________
* II Corinthians 3:6
|